• Print
  • Email

Break The Rules For Creative Compositions

The Rule of Thirds is Sometimes Better to be Broken

This Article Features Photo Zoom

Tip o the weekThere are some unbreakable rules of photography: always use the correct exposure, never allow blur to ruin your shots, and adhere to the rule of thirds to ensure you create crowd-pleasing compositions. Of course, the best part about all of these rules is breaking them—especially the aesthetic ones.

Rules, particularly as they relate to how to compose an interesting shot, are there to help beginners learn how to create generally pleasing images that appeal to a wide variety of eyes. Of course, if every image adhered to these rules they’d quickly become boring and it would cease to be a commonly accepted rule. The point is this: know the rules, and know how to break them for even better photographs.

The rule of thirds says that an image is divided into nine equal parts by horizontal and vertical lines—two of each set. Think of a tic-tac-toe board centered over an image. Where the lines intersect—one third of the way from each side, top and bottom—are the ideal placement for subjects in a scene. It’s always true. Except when it’s not…

Symmetry is very effective in photographs too—as much as the rule of thirds. This is particularly effective when the compositions are simple and minimal. The rule of thirds is a convention that helps make sense of a cluttered world around us, to see it in a more palatable way. If the scene is already clean and palatable, however, it’s bound to lend itself to the breaking of the rule of thirds.

Symmetry is also aesthetically pleasing, so don’t be afraid to center a subject in the proverbial bull’s-eye at the center of the frame. This is particularly effective with portraits or other simple subjects that have one precise focal point and are devoid of much other important information. Additional empty space around the subject makes a centered subject even more isolated, and the symmetrical composition even more interesting. For images that are truly equally balanced (whether horizontally or vertically) a centered image that breaks the rule of thirds can actually be more aesthetically pleasing than one that follows the rules.

Aside from centering a subject, consider centering a horizon line too. The reasons are much the same, and if done poorly can create a stale and stagnant image. But a beautiful landscape full of open sky and interesting earth is ripe for bisecting and breaking the rule of thirds. Without a center of interest, the cleanly bisected frame becomes its own graphically interesting image.

The rule of thirds also applies to the concept of leading room—the space in front of a moving object or in the direction a person is looking. This space provides “breathing room” for the viewer, and makes for a comfortable viewing experience. The rule applies for a conventionally acceptable photograph, but what if you want to create tension? A person almost completely out of frame with very little or no lead room creates a very tense feeling—as if they’re literally fleeing the scene or pushing the boundaries of the frame.

Even if you don’t break the rule of thirds successfully—say you prefer pictures that adhere to that rule much more than the ones that break it—that’s fine too. The point is that you’re actively seeing, and considering all of the compositional choices you have every time you put your camera to your eye. That awareness alone is bound to make you a better photographer.

5 Comments

  1. Thanks for writing this article. I teach a beginning photography class, and we discuss the 'Rules' or 'Guidelines'. I tell my students they are just that - rules. And that sometimes those rules can be broken - but you should know how to use the rules to their fullest before you attempt to break them. Getting a great photo that breaks the rules isn't easy. Thanks for sharing this - I will include a link to this page in my handouts to the class. And thanks for showing an example. Brad.
  2. I agree with Brad Sharp that you have to know how to use the rules before you can break them. You also have to know when to break them, if you should at all. There are mathematical and artistic reasons why the rule of thirds works nearly every time in compositions. I agree in principal with what you wrote, but I disagree with the particular photo you used as an example. I captured that photo from the web, cropped it so that the horse and rider are at the top, left intersection of the rule-of-thirds grid, and it is MUCH better. Eliminating all that blank sky, moving the horizon to the top third of the scene and eliminating the bulls eye subject makes a for a far more pleasing composition. Yes, I agree there are times to break the rules, but in my opinion that photo isn't one of them. I also think the photo should be in color, but that's for another discussion at another time. Carl
  3. Carl commented that the photo of the horse in the field would have been better if the rule of thirds had been followed. Well, it would have been more ordinary, but breaking the rule in this case made it striking, and that's better... Tom
  4. You will not win one contest with this picture. It seems that you have to blur,under expose,disregard the rule of thirds. and if your luckey you might win. Oh by the way if you are not a professional photographer that sells or is known by the contest mag you still will not win....I think is my kind of picture. No photoshop fake image.. this is great...
  5. I agree with Sawalich's comments, but I think the line of trees that forms the horizon in the sample photo dilutes the impact of this black-and-white photo. The centered main subject -- the horse and rider -- blends into the trees, and at first glance is one solid mass. If the horizon had been minimal (as the horizon line in many Sahara desert sand dune photos), the main subject would have more impact because your eye would have no other choice but to zero-in on the rider and horse. This is not quite the "cleanly bisected frame" Sawalich mentions. (Also, a lower angle so the horizon line could be seen some distance under the horse's belly would help, too. And the bales of hay are distracting.) If the photo were in color, and the rider's clothes and horse stood out starkly against everything else, then maybe the photo woudl work "as-is."

Add Comment

 
Win This! Digital Photo Magazine Enewsletter
Banner
 

 
  • International residents, click here.
Check out our other photo sites:
outdoor photographerdigital photo pro