Home Cameras SLRs D-SLR's: State Of The Art, Part II
Tuesday, February 3, 2009

D-SLR State Of The Art, Part II

What to know about the latest digital sensors, ISO and image quality

This Article Features Photo Zoom

Nikon’s new 24.5-megapixel D3X
Has a full-frame sensor measuring 35.9x24.0mm with a maximum resolution of 6048 x 4032 pixels, translating to a pixel size of 5.94 microns. That’s larger than the D300’s, but much smaller than the D3’s. We haven’t had a chance to use this new camera yet, but based on pixel size alone, we’d expect its image quality to fall between that of the D3 and the D300.

But wait! The D3X has twice as many pixels as the D3 (albeit smaller ones). To produce a given-size print, a D3X image can be downsampled to match the D3’s resolution, and doing so results in reduced image noise. It turns out that the D3X’s much higher pixel count trumps the D3’s bigger pixels, and the D3X images will produce better-looking prints of any given size, all else being equal.

The same holds true for Canon’s 21.1-megapixel, full-frame EOS-1Ds Mark III and 10.1-megapixel, APS-H-format EOS-1D Mark III. The 10-megapixel model has bigger pixels and better per-pixel performance, but the 21.1-megapixel model delivers better-looking prints of any given size (and especially at sizes beyond the 10.1-megapixel image’s range).

dslrsTiny microlenses—one over each of the millions of pixels in an image sensor—supply more light-gathering area for each pixel, improving sensitivity. As seen in this representation, the microlenses on the sensor in Canon’s EOS 40D (above, left) increase light-gathering area by minimizing the gaps between microlenses. Some of the latest D-SLRs, such as the Canon EOS 50D (represented at above, right), use gapless microlenses, in effect turning the entire surface area of the sensor into a light-gathering powerhouse.

The Plot Thickens
To further complicate things, all else isn’t always equal. Consider Canon’s new EOS 5D Mark II. It uses a 21.1-megapixel sensor quite similar to the one in the EOS-1Ds Mark III, with the same 6.4-micron pixel size, yet it has a top normal-range ISO setting of 6400 and a top expanded ISO setting of 25,600 vs. the EOS-1Ds Mark III’s top normal-range setting of 1600 and top expanded ISO of 3200. And Canon states that the EOS 5D Mark II produces the best image quality of any EOS D-SLR ever. What happened? Well, in part, Canon’s new DIGIC 4 image processor; in part, a new RGB color filter for the sensor; and, in part, proprietary improvements throughout to raise sensitivity and lower noise.

Another thing to keep in mind is that a pixel doesn’t consist solely of a light sensor. Part of each pixel is taken up by circuitry that moves the data. So the light-sensitive area of each pixel is actually somewhat smaller than the pixel itself. One of the things manufacturers do to improve sensor performance is reduce the size of the circuitry to increase the fill factor—the ratio of light-gathering area to total pixel area. Another thing manufacturers do to increase the light-gathering area is use microlenses over each pixel. The latest sensors use gapless microlenses, meaning the entire pixel area collects light (see the diagram on the opposite page). Moving the microlenses closer to the pixels also helps improve light-gathering capability.

Dynamic Range
While microlenses increase effective sensitivity, they don’t help much with dynamic range. That’s because a given-size pixel can hold only so many photons.

If you have a one-gallon bucket with a diameter of six inches and a one-pint bucket with a diameter of two inches, and stick them both out in the rain, the large bucket will collect more water faster. If you put a funnel with a six-inch diameter over the one-pint bucket, it will collect more rainwater faster, but it can still hold only one pint.

When a pixel fills with photons, saturation—“blow-out” of highlights—results, and photons can even spill over into adjoining pixels. This is sometimes referred to as “blooming.”

Here again, sensors with bigger pixels tend to deliver greater dynamic range than sensors with smaller pixels. However, today’s sensors and image processors can deliver a wide dynamic range even with multimegapixel cameras and their relatively small pixels.

How Accurate Are Digital ISO Speeds?

Practitioners of the Zone System made famous by Ansel Adams discovered that exposing film at their ISO speeds (ASA speeds, in those days) didn’t give them the desired density on Zone I; the shadow areas were underexposed. Their film-speed testing generally revealed a need to feed a lower ASA speed into their exposure meters.

If you use a handheld meter, or the Sunny 16 rule, you’ll likely find that digital ISO speeds also are a bit optimistic. The Sunny 16 rule states that for a frontlit subject in bright sun, the proper exposure is a shutter speed of 1/ISO at ƒ/16, or its equivalent. For ISO 200, that would mean an exposure of 1⁄200 sec. at ƒ/16, or 1⁄400 sec. at ƒ/11, or 1⁄800 sec. at ƒ/8, etc. I’ve found that with most D-SLRs (I’ve tested 52 over the years), the Sunny 16 rule results in underexposure. (The cameras’ built-in TTL metering pretty well compensates for this, but I’ve found some cameras require +0.3 or +0.6 exposure compensation for most scenes.)


2 Comments

Add Comment

 
 
 

 
  • International residents, click here.
Check out our other sites:
Digital Photo Pro Outdoor Photographer HDVideoPro Golf Tips Plane & Pilot