• 
• 
• 

D-SLRS: Pro Vs. Enthusiast

We compare each brand’s entry-level models with its pro offerings to see what we’re getting dollar for dollar

This Article Features Photo Zoom

We all know that top-of-the-line pro digital SLRs cost a lot more than entry-level models. There often are huge differences in quality and performance between the two, but not always. Entry-level models are becoming increasingly sophisticated and capable of image quality that's even better than pro cameras produced just a few years ago. Some entry-level cameras even share some of the same components and features as the latest pro models within the same brand.

Since not every manufacturer has what amounts to a pro-level versus enthusiast model, we've pit their entry-level up against their best D-SLR to date. Fujifilm, Samsung and Sigma don't have multiple models for this type of comparison, but we still wanted to include them so you can see how they stack up against the others.


Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III Vs. The EOS Rebel XSi
Canon's flagship, the EOS-1Ds Mark III, has a few things in common with the Rebel XSi, but not a whole lot. They both have a DIGIC III image processor, although the Mark III has two of them. Each has the same 3.0-inch TFT monitor on the back, which can be used in Live View mode to frame shots. Both have a self-cleaning sensor, as well as 14-bit analog-to-digital conversion-and that's a huge step up from 12-bit AD conversion in terms of overall color and tonal information being recorded in each image file.

The EOS-1Ds Mark III has a full-frame image sensor with a whopping 21.1 megapixels, whereas the Rebel XSi has a smaller APS-C-sized sensor with 12.2 megapixels. The EOS-1Ds Mark III has a quick 45-point AF system, a 63-zone evaluative metering system, and can shoot full-res files at 5 fps. It also has slots for both CompactFlash and SD/SDHC memory cards, a built-in power grip, and a host of custom setting functions that the Rebel XSi doesn't have.

Though not as sophisticated at the Mark III, the Rebel XSi's 9-area AF system and 35-zone metering system are still impressive for an entry-level camera. Continuous shooting is a decent 3.5 fps, and there's some Basic Zone modes that automatically set the camera for shooting popular subject types.




Nikon D3 VS. The D60
Other than the advanced EXPEED image processor, the Nikon D3 and the new D60 have little else in common, starting with the sensors. The D3 has a 12.1-megapixel, full-frame CMOS sensor; the D60 has a smaller, 10.2-megapixel DX-format CCD sensor.

The D3 can shoot full-res images at 9 fps. It has selectable 12- or 14-bit RAW output, a super-high-resolution 3.0-inch LCD monitor with two LiveView modes, dual CompactFlash card slots and rugged pro construction that's well-sealed against the elements. The quickness of the 51-point AF module and the accuracy of the 1,005-pixel sensor of the metering system help minimize the chance of a missed opportunity, whether you're dialed into an auto mode or working manually. Add to that Advanced Noise Reduction technology, and you can get impressively clean exposures in low-light conditions, even when shooting at ISO 1600 or higher.

The new Nikon D60 can shoot full-res images at 3 fps. It only offers 12-bit AD conversion, though, and the 3-point AF module and 420-segment metering system isn't as advanced as the D3's. It has only one slot for a CompactFlash card, and the ISOs for low-light shooting don't go up nearly as high as the D3. The D60, however, does have an innovative Active Dust Reduction System with Airflow Control that's not available on the D3. It also has a sweet stop-motion video feature for shooting a sequence of shots that get compiled into short film.

Add Comment