When Not To Use Lens StabilizationDPMag Published in Blog
Image stabilization is a pretty amazing technological breakthrough, when you think about it. Your lens actually helps steady itself. Amazing! With built-in electromagnets and gyroscopes, vibration-reducing lenses counteract the camera shake caused by your unsteady hands, which is the cause of many blurry photos. First-gen stabilization was good for one stop, maybe two. That meant that if under normal circumstances it would require a shutter speed of 1/60th to get a sharp image, you could actually handhold at 1/30th or even 1/15th of a second with stabilization turned on and still get sharp photos. Recent advancements have manufacturers advertising up to four full stops of handholding power. That means in the scenario I just mentioned you could handhold safely all the way down to 1/4th of a second. But no matter how amazing lens stabilization technology gets, it still can't compensate for one thing: operator error. There's one crucial time when image stabilization actually causes blurrier photos—and that's when you've got your camera locked down to a tripod. Check out Steve Berardi's PhotoNaturalist blog for more info on when not to use lens stabilization to get sharp photos, including photographic evidence that shows just how blurry a stabilized image can be when used incorrectly.
Photo by Steve Berardi
Capturing everyday life with beautiful light in the home
To understand how resolution works, start with area resolution
How to make skin look great with subtle changes to the position and quality of the light source—whether that’s a strobe or sunlight or anything in between
Full-frame DSLRs are hot! The reasons?
For many years, the two most popular types of digital cameras have been compact models and digital SLRs. Each offers advantages over the other.
All-in-one zooms that can cover wide-angles to telephoto