When Not To Use Lens StabilizationDPMag Published in Blog
Image stabilization is a pretty amazing technological breakthrough, when you think about it. Your lens actually helps steady itself. Amazing! With built-in electromagnets and gyroscopes, vibration-reducing lenses counteract the camera shake caused by your unsteady hands, which is the cause of many blurry photos. First-gen stabilization was good for one stop, maybe two. That meant that if under normal circumstances it would require a shutter speed of 1/60th to get a sharp image, you could actually handhold at 1/30th or even 1/15th of a second with stabilization turned on and still get sharp photos. Recent advancements have manufacturers advertising up to four full stops of handholding power. That means in the scenario I just mentioned you could handhold safely all the way down to 1/4th of a second. But no matter how amazing lens stabilization technology gets, it still can't compensate for one thing: operator error. There's one crucial time when image stabilization actually causes blurrier photos—and that's when you've got your camera locked down to a tripod. Check out Steve Berardi's PhotoNaturalist blog for more info on when not to use lens stabilization to get sharp photos, including photographic evidence that shows just how blurry a stabilized image can be when used incorrectly.
Photo by Steve Berardi
Pro techniques to help you take unique and personal images for your photographic journal
Use these principles to create a solid foundation for your photo studio
10 insights for creating stunning art that will resonate with contemporary clients
Full-frame DSLRs are hot! The reasons?
For many years, the two most popular types of digital cameras have been compact models and digital SLRs. Each offers advantages over the other.
All-in-one zooms that can cover wide-angles to telephoto